|
UPDATE: Since
the above was written, the Sathya Sai Org., has changed
the content of their page (as it was captured by us, see
below) without any explanation or apology, which again demonstrates
their unaccountability and subterfuge. How they could have
posted such grossly false information "accidentally"
- as has been claimed (without any documentation whatever)
on the web site of an Australian, Alan Kazlev, is quite incomprehensible.
The Sathya Sai Org. of UK allowed this wholly untrue announcement
to stand for months, despite the reaction of the Westminster
Cathedral authority directly to its overall leader Bhagani
(see below), who has complete authority over the entire
UK Organization. It is worth noting that, only after our
web page was posted - and not until long afterwards - was
the page silently altered.
Instead, we view at their URL
a report on a Sai Organization meeting at Harrow High School
with Phyllis Krystal etc. This school - incidentally - is
NOT the famous Harrow Public School, but a very ordinary
mixed comprehensive State school with below average to average
standards over the last 4 years, according to State Inspection
Reports to be found on the internet). The SSO takes care
to point out that 60% who attended were not members of the
organisation. That they make a point of this is in line
with the SSO's constant efforts to misrepresent itself as
quite acceptable to a wider community. But this %age is
not at all surprising since most Sai devotees do not (wish
to) sign up to its demanding requirements. So the 60% majority
at this meeting would naturally have been parents and some
pupils.
The Sai organisation of UK shirks
its responsibility to inform the public honestly. The reference
to the Cathedral below implied Catholic approval when the
opposite is the case. We researched this through a contact
with Westminster Cathedral, while the SSO remained as silent
as the grave. If Bhagani did not know the webmaster, why
did he not reply to the Cathedral and say so? Instead we
are informed reliably that he still has not corresponded
with it at all. The inference was that he was content for
the disinformation. The Cathedral Administrator wrote to
Bhagani because he is the spokesman for this cult in the
UK. but he did not bother to reply, in classic cult fashion.
Let us see whether Bhagani dares to 'come clean' at last! |